Directions: after you have presented your theses to the class, type up the workshopped/edited thesis and your four reasons/topic sentences. For this week, you will not be required to comment on your classmates' blogs, but I would encourage you to review your classmates' blogs, in case you are still struggling.
Due by 10pm the day you present your thesis. So, if you present on Tuesday, the blog will be due at 10pm that night. If you present on Thursday, the blog will be due by 10pm that night.
5 points for being on time
5 points for following directions (you must have at least four reasons to support your thesis)
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Saturday, October 18, 2014
S.O.A.P.S. and Logical Fallacies
Directions: Watch the video and identify the rhetorical elements.
Part One:
Identify the S.O.A.P.S. for each side of the battle. Label each as Shakespeare and Dr, Seuss.
Part Two:
Identify at least two logical fallacies that each author's side makes. State each logical fallacy and then state why it is a logical fallacy.
Response due before class on Thursday.
Classmate response: instead of a response to a classmate, respond to yourself. Our discussion on Wednesday will have clarified some of the fallacies and the S.O.A.P.S. If you feel that you correctly labeled everything, then congratulate yourself on a job well-done. However, if you want to add to parts One or Two in order to create a more complete analysis, then this is your chance. Your initial response and response to yourself will be graded as follows:
Initial response: 2 points
Following directions in initial response: 2 points
Response to self on time: 2 points
Response to self accurately identifies mistakes in original post (if any): 4 points
Part One:
Identify the S.O.A.P.S. for each side of the battle. Label each as Shakespeare and Dr, Seuss.
Part Two:
Identify at least two logical fallacies that each author's side makes. State each logical fallacy and then state why it is a logical fallacy.
Response due before class on Thursday.
Classmate response: instead of a response to a classmate, respond to yourself. Our discussion on Wednesday will have clarified some of the fallacies and the S.O.A.P.S. If you feel that you correctly labeled everything, then congratulate yourself on a job well-done. However, if you want to add to parts One or Two in order to create a more complete analysis, then this is your chance. Your initial response and response to yourself will be graded as follows:
Initial response: 2 points
Following directions in initial response: 2 points
Response to self on time: 2 points
Response to self accurately identifies mistakes in original post (if any): 4 points
Response due by 5pm on Friday, October 24th.
Saturday, October 11, 2014
Ethos and Pathos
Directions: watch the following video and point out the S.O.A.P.S. and the ethos and pathos. What makes the ethos and pathos effective? What makes the ethos and/or pathos ineffective? Would the clip be as effective if the speaker used only ethos or pathos?
Initial response due before class on Thursday.
Reply to classmate: Find a classmate that you disagree with his/her labeling of one of the elements (or who left out one of the elements) and ask a question that will lead him/her to the discovery of a deeper understanding of that element. For instance, did your classmate truly understand the purpose of the video or the way the speaker used ethos and pathos? Or did your classmate misinterpret how the two were used together in order to achieve the speech? If you cannot find a classmate you disagree with, find a post you agree with and detail why and how your classmate's response was effective.
Reply to classmate due before 5pm on Friday, October 17th.
Initial response due before class on Thursday.
Reply to classmate: Find a classmate that you disagree with his/her labeling of one of the elements (or who left out one of the elements) and ask a question that will lead him/her to the discovery of a deeper understanding of that element. For instance, did your classmate truly understand the purpose of the video or the way the speaker used ethos and pathos? Or did your classmate misinterpret how the two were used together in order to achieve the speech? If you cannot find a classmate you disagree with, find a post you agree with and detail why and how your classmate's response was effective.
Reply to classmate due before 5pm on Friday, October 17th.
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Unit II Reflection
Directions: You have now written your first English 121 argument. Now, please answer the following questions: Have you ever written a college paper before? How does this assignment compare? How do you think you will use the skills you learned in Unit II in your future essays (in this class and your future college classes)? Do you have any questions about writing a short argument before we move on? (On this last question, if I get a lot of the same answer, we will review in class, rather than me providing you with an individual answer.)
You can respond in paragraph or list form. 200 word maximum.
Due before 5pm on October 8th.
You can respond in paragraph or list form. 200 word maximum.
Due before 5pm on October 8th.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)